MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SCAR TISSUE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION WITH UNFAVORABLE OUTCOMES

UDC 618.5-089.888.61-091

Authors

  • Olga Yu. Pachkovskaya River Medical Center, Barnaul, Russia Email: pipulj@mail.ru
  • Maria G. Nikolaeva Altai State Medical University, Barnaul, Russia; Altai branch of National Medical Research Center of Hematology, Barnaul, Russia Email: nikolmg@yandex.ru
  • Marina B. Igitova Altai State Medical University, Barnaul, Russia Email: igitova-2011@mail.ru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31684/25418475-2023-3-94

Keywords:

uterine scar, pregnancy, perinatal lesions of the central nervous system, morphological examination, microcirculation dysfunction

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate changes in the morphology of scar tissue tissues after cesarean section with unfavorable perinatal outcomes in the consecutive pregnancy. Materials and methods. A morphological study of a resected scar on the uterus after a previous cesarean section was performed. The main group (n=28) included samples of scar tissues of patients in case of unfavorable perinatal outcomes;  the comparison group (n=32) included biological samples of 32 pregnant women at birth of healthy newborns with an Apgar score of 7 or more points and no signs of physiological immaturity and fetal growth retardation. Results. In case of unfavorable perinatal outcomes significantly more often uneven and/or weak blood filling of the microvasculature was determined (p=0,0483 and p=0,0492 respectively) in the area of scar tissue regarding to the group of women at the birth of healthy children. In contrast, the comparison group is characterized by a significantly larger number of sections with neoangiogenesis (p=0,0452). The most significant difference in the histological pattern of the scar tissue of the comparison groups was the presence of moderate diffuse intermuscular stroma edema: in 85,7% of the samples of the main group and in 56,3% of the comparison group (p=0,0173). Conclusion. It can be assumed that the formation of placental dysfunction with an outcome of unfavorable perinatal outcomes in patients with a scar on the uterus after cesarean section is preceded by a violation of the formation of an adequate uterine structure in the scar area due to local microcirculation dysfunction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author information

Olga Yu. Pachkovskaya,
River Medical Center, Barnaul, Russia

Obstetrician-Gynecologist, Medical Center "River", Barnaul; Postgraduate student of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Advanced Training Course, Altai State Medical University, Barnaul. 656056, Barnaul, Bavarina square, 1, Н1.
E-mail: pipulj@mail.ru

Maria G. Nikolaeva,
Altai State Medical University, Barnaul, Russia; Altai branch of National Medical Research Center of Hematology, Barnaul, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Advanced Training Course, Altai State Medical University, Barnaul; Senior Researcher, Altai Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Hematology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Barnaul. E-mail: nikolmg@yandex.ru

Marina B. Igitova,
Altai State Medical University, Barnaul, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with Advanced Training Course, Altai State Medical University, Barnaul. E-mail: igitova-2011@mail.ru

References

  • Milovanov A.P., Nizyaeva N.V., Fokina T.V., Tikhonova N.B., Kulikov I.A., Shmakov R.G. Clinical and morphological characterization of the spectrum of atypical placentation in the uterus. Archives of Pathology. 2023; 85(2): 13-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/patol20238502113
  • Donnez O. Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased. Fertil Steril. 2020 Apr; 113(4): 704-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.037. PMID: 32228874.
  • Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, Vikhareva O, Markey S, Chaillet N, Moore L, Paris G, Bujold E. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr; 214(4): 507.e1-507.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11. PMID: 26522861.
  • Clark EA. S. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. E.A.S. Clark, R.M. Silver. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 205(6): 2–10.
  • Aigyrbaeva A.N. Relevance of compliance with the intergenetic interval and principles of pregravidar preparation of women at the primary level of obstetric and gynecological care. Bulletin of KazNMU. 2018; 3: 9-11. (In Russ.)
  • Pachkovskaya O.Y., Igitova M.B. Placental dysfunction in pregnant women with uterine scar after cesarean section. Scientific and Practical Journal "Zdravookhranenie Kyrgyzstana". 2020; 4: 25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51350/1694-8068.2020.12.4.25
  • Jauniaux E, Zosmer N, De Braud LV, Ashoor G, Ross J, Jurkovic D. Development of the utero-placental circulation in cesarean scar pregnancies: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar; 226(3): 399.e1-399.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.056. Epub 2021 Sep 4. PMID: 34492222.
  • Kamilova M.Y., Yunusova S.H., Uzakova U.D. Placental insufficiency in pregnant women with uterine scar. SCIENCES OF EUROPE | MEDICAL SCIENCES. 2017; 16 (16): 27-29.
  • Karkashadze G.A., Anikin A.V., Zimina E.P., Davydova I.V., Karimova H.M., Zakharyan M.E., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Maslova O.I., Yatsyk G.V., Valieva S.I., Gevorkyan A.K. Modern data on the pathogenesis and treatment of hypoxic-ischemic brain lesions in newborns. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2016; 13(5): 452-467. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v13i5.1641
  • Ershova E.G., Remnyova O.V. Obstetric risk. Critical moments of the system of perinatal prognosis. Mother and Child in Kuzbass. 2018; 2 (73): 15-19. (In Russ.)
  • Zharkin N.A. Cesarean section: medical, social and moral and ethical problems. N.A. Zharkin, L.S. Logutova, T.G. Semikhova. Rossiyskiy vestnik obstetricher-gynecologicov. 2019; 19(4): 5-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush2019190415
  • Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, Zimmer M. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section. Ginekol Pol. 2017; 88(4): 174-179. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2017.0034. PMID: 28509317
  • di Pasquo E, Kiener AJO, DallAsta A, Commare A, Angeli L, Frusca T, Ghi T. Evaluation of the uterine scar stiffness in women with previous Cesarean section by ultrasound elastography: A cohort study. Clin Imaging. 2020 Aug; 64: 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.03.006.
  • Qi YF, He YL, Ding N, Ma LK, Qian TY, Li Y, Xue HD, Jin ZY. Assessment of Changes in the Cesarean Scar and Uterus Between One and Two Years after Cesarean Section Using 3D T2w SPACE MRI. Chin Med Sci J. 2022 Jun 30; 37(2): 151-158. https://doi.org/10.24920/003870.
  • Kalisa R, Rulisa S, van Roosmalen J, van den Akker T. Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 25; 17(1): 272. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1467-5. PMID: 28841838; PMCID: PMC5574082.
  • Jauniaux E, Zosmer N, De Braud LV, Ashoor G, Ross J, Jurkovic D. Development of the utero-placental circulation in cesarean scar pregnancies: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar; 226(3): 399.e1-399.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.056.
  • Published

    2023-09-15

    How to Cite

    Pachkovskaya O. Y., Nikolaeva M. G., Igitova M. B. MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SCAR TISSUE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION WITH UNFAVORABLE OUTCOMES: UDC 618.5-089.888.61-091 // Bulletin of Medical Science, 2023. Vol. 31, № 3. P. 94–99 DOI: 10.31684/25418475-2023-3-94. URL: https://newbmn.asmu.ru/bmn/article/view/611.

    Most read articles by the same author(s)